Latest Stories

Although I campaigned hard to remain in the European Union, I respect the outcome of the referendum. The UK will therefore now be leaving the EU and the triggering of Article 50 is required to start the process. The recent court ruling was important, but it does not change the outcome of the referendum. What the court said was that the Government cannot initiate Article 50 using what is known as the Royal prerogative power; instead this must be a decision for Parliament. The Government is currently appealing but if it is unsuccessful, then I expect that they will come forward with legislation to trigger Article 50, which I will support.

I know that there are some who have argued that the referendum was only advisory, but this misses the point that it is politically binding - the decision having been taken to ask the people to make their choice - and Parliament should accept the result and work to secure the best deal for our country as we leave the European Union. I say that because the consequences of Parliament refusing to accept the referendum vote would be very serious for faith in our democracy. It has also been argued that Parliament should delay the triggering of Article 50 until there is a firm deal on the table, but this can’t happen for the very simple reason that until negotiations begin – and that requires Article 50 to be triggered first – no deal will be able to be reached.

Having said that, the referendum did not decide the terms on which we will leave; nor did it set out what Britain’s new relationship with the other 27 member states will look like once we have left. This will be a matter for negotiation in what is the most complex challenge we have faced as a country in decades.

There is no more important issue facing Britain than the terms of our departure from the EU, and it is vital that there is full scrutiny and accountability during the process. Parliament cannot be a bystander; it has to be a participant. The referendum result has, understandably, created a great deal of uncertainty and the decisions that will be made by the Government over the coming months and years will have profound implications for the future of our country, our economy, our people and their jobs and our place in the world.

In my view, we must seek as full access as possible to the single market, including for business and financial services which are so important to our economy. We must also protect employment, environmental and social rights. I accept that adjustments to the freedom of movement principle will be made and we must establish fair migration rules as part of our new relationship with the EU.  I also strongly believe that the Government should immediately guarantee the status of EU nationals who are currently living and working in the UK and contributing so much to our society.

The Prime Minister has announced that she wants to begin the formal process of leaving the EU by triggering Article 50 before 31 March 2017. The House of Commons unanimously agreed that there should be full and transparent debate on the Government's plans. To allow sufficient time for this, the Government should publish its negotiating objectives, accompanied by an economic impact assessment, as soon as possible so that the House of Commons can consider and pass judgement on these. I also hope that the Government will indicate that if it cannot complete all the negotiations needed within the two years then it will seek transitional arrangements so as to provide more certainty and a smoother transition.

In my role as the Chair of the new Brexit select committee, I and my colleagues will be scrutinising the Government’s plans very carefully as this process unfolds.
 
Hilary Benn MP

 

Brexit and the Article 50 court ruling

Although I campaigned hard to remain in the European Union, I respect the outcome of the referendum. The UK will therefore now be leaving the EU and the triggering of...

First published in South Leeds Life 1st November 2016, available here http://www.southleedslife.com/local-regeneration-local-jobs-local-history/

It is not often that we get the chance as a city to decide on a major regeneration scheme on a really important site, but that is exactly what is happening on the south bank of the River Aire.

The South Bank Regeneration Initiative covers an area of land as big as 250 football pitches and according to the Council will “double the size of Leeds city centre.” Among the proposals being looked at are a new park and other public open spaces, a new station for HS2, improved public transport and proposals for 35,000 jobs and 4,000 much-needed new homes. The type of development eventually chosen will not only have a huge impact on the area but will also be an important statement about the kind of city we want to be. I think it will be really important to have affordable family housing as part of the scheme and we must seize the opportunity to make this an exemplary low carbon and sustainable project.

The public consultation process is currently underway and the deadline for comments is 15 November 2016. Anyone who is interested in contributing thoughts and ideas can fill in the online version of the survey at www.southbankleeds.co.uk or you can email the team at southbank@leeds.gov.uk.

The announcement that OneSubsea, based in Stourton, is planning to lay off about two thirds of its workforce has come as a devastating blow to all the staff there. The company has been manufacturing hi-tech equipment for the oil and gas for nearly 60 years on the site, and the plan to end manufacturing means that around 600 highly-skilled jobs could go. I remain in touch with both that the union UNITE and the company, and there are a lot of questions the workers are asking especially as I understand that some of the work currently done in Leeds may transfer to other plants overseas. The UK oil and gas industry has seen a huge number of job losses since the oil price collapsed as too much capacity chases too few customers, but I think the Government should be looking at what it can do to help the industry.

Finally, a bit of history. I was having a conversation the other day with someone about the famous 1936 Battle of Cable Street in which anti-fascists in East London stood up against Mosley’s Blackshirts - the 80th anniversary has just been celebrated - when I was reminded that South Leeds had its own Battle of Holbeck Moor a week before.

On 27 September 1936, Oswald Mosley and the British Union of Fascists had decided to parade hundreds of Blackshirts in Calverley Street and then marched down to Holbeck. There, on the Moor, they were ‘greeted’ by a large crowd of protestors who sang the Red Flag to drown him out while some threw stones.
 
I should have been paying more attention because the eagle-eyed among you would no doubt point out that the ever-excellent South Leeds Life website made reference to the Battle of Holbeck Moor back in 2011. And the moral of this tale? Anything London can do, Leeds can do earlier.

Hilary's Article for South Leeds Life - November 2016

First published in South Leeds Life 1st November 2016, available here http://www.southleedslife.com/local-regeneration-local-jobs-local-history/ It is not often that we get the chance as a city to decide on a major regeneration...

Parliament debated a Labour motion yesterday on the need for scrutiny of the UK's withdrawal from the EU.

Here's my speech: http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/9da7b790-789f-46f3-8fbd-b0cc29e949fb?in=15:33:04&out=15:45:54    

More Stories >

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.